Entries in advertising (15)

Tuesday
27Oct2009

Back to the now: Ads in Marty McFly's 2015

I used to think of the future of advertising as the one portrayed in Back to the Future Part II.  Y'know, the part where Marty McFly is in the futuristic downtown area of Hill Valley, bombarded by ads and startled by a 3D hologram of Jaws 19.  Advertising was satirically presented to be omnipresent and intrusive.  We thought it was funny, but in reality, we knew it would probably be annoying if it ever actually went down that way.

Fortunately, we haven't quite reached that saturation point.  (Although with the average person viewing up to XXX ads per day, it's easy to make a counter argument that we are already annoyed.)  But as we approach Marty's future, this post from Justin Foster reminded me we aren't too far off:

Think about this ... a single person with a camera phone can post video, photos, and written content to a blog, Facebook, Twitter, and hundreds of other web platforms.  This content, depending how viral it is, can spread to hundreds or thousands of other people. Now combine that times billions.  What happens to the influence and reach of traditional media when The People become The Media?  It profoundly effects the way We the People consume information and entertainment.  This is not just disruptive to media business models such as selling ad space based on eye-balls.  It changes the rules for what "news" is, what a brand is, message control, the roles of government, and more.  Properly harnessed, it can make a young company the world's #1 brand without spending a dime on advertising (Google) or it can lead to the demise of established brands and traditions.
For those versed in the evolution of social media, this should sound pretty familiar.  People embracing brands, becoming advocates and spreading the word through new media, etc.  But for the first time, I had a bizarre futuristic vision of people driving the saturation, vs. the brands themselves.
Thursday
17Sep2009

My day at Sonic Drive-In

On Wednesday, August 26, 2009, Sonic opened its first store in Massachusetts. Until then, the nearest Sonic had been 150 miles away in Kingston, NY. But for some reason it never stopped them from airing their commercials in the Boston area over the past few years. It always seemed like a questionable tactic -- lazy even -- to run ads in a market where your product doesn't even exist.  But then Sonic finally came to Massachusetts, and the customers came in droves. I was among them.

Going against everything I generally avoid -- fast food, chain restaurants, driving, suburbia -- I made a pilgrimmage to the Sonic in Peabody, MA. We went on Saturday, and despite being a few days late to the party, we found a long line of cars, with traffic re-routed to accomodate the rush, and waited for over an hour for the chance to eat fast food delivered to our car by servers on roller skates.

The line of cars felt like a tailgate, with people chanting and joking with other folks in the car line. As cars left Sonic, having triumphantly received their meal, they yelled to the people still waiting, "It's totally worth it!" without a hint of sarcasm. The line weaved past an empty Wendy's parking lot. We even sent someone in there to get some chicken nuggets for us while we waited in the Sonic line, knowing there would be no wait.

Eventually, we got our food, which I would rate as adequate. But it was the buzz that Sonic managed to generate that qualified their Massachusetts opening as a success. Here are my takeaways from the day.

TV advertising still works. Sonic's successful opening went contrary to all the talk that TV advertising is dying. Not only did their TV ads serve as the primary way to build the Sonic brand, they managed to drum up interest in a region where their product didn't even exist yet. Instead of frustrating consumers, it just got them more excited. It's a testament to an engaging brand.

People flock to experiences. Sonic is unique to any type of fast food experience that this region has.  When it comes down to it, the food isn't particularly unusual, but the menu (i.e. Tater Tots, Ocean Water) and drive-in restaurant experience is. People knew Sonic well enough to feel like they would be missing out on something by not going. And, like a good movie, they wanted to be in on the conversation.

Word of mouth trumps social media marketing. I had heard months ago via Facebook status updates that a Sonic would be opening, and that's how I heard it had officially opened as well. Until I started writing this post, I didn't even realize Sonic had a Facebook fan page (although I'm not surprised). Had they rolled out a larger social media push, would it have really mattered? Some buzz just lives on its own.

It's nice to have people seek you out. When I heard Sonic had officially opened, I actually couldn't confirm it. A Google search didn't reveal any stories or news reports that the restaurant had opened its doors. The Sonic website didn't either, and no official address was available -- although I knew the general area it was located in. (The Facebook page I just found today had announced it, apparently). Yet, people found out where Sonic was and went. Although, I would recommend actually providing addresses of newly-opened locations on your website, Sonic must have been pretty happy they didn't have to.

My conclusion isn't anything radical. Sonic is a unique, branded experience, and it's part of their success. Don't do everything the way it's supposed to be done, and you have done something different. Seems like a pretty basic concept, but for a lot of brands, it's not.

Monday
31Aug2009

Viral marketing; then and now

Do you remember the first piece of viral communication you received?

Because I do -- well, the first, truly notable pieces anyway.  Sure, there were chain emails, quizzes and video attachments that found their way into my first email account on AOL. But there are two that stand out for me, and they were both a (relatively) long time ago.

1. "All Your Base Are Belong to Us." (2000-2002)

This video is still so awesome that I actually re-watch it on occasion. And when I make references to this meme, without fail, more people recognize the references than I ever intend. (Can you imagine a meme like this lasting a full two years?)

2. "Subservient Chicken" (~2005)

Although a few years after "All Your Base", Crispin, Porter + Bogulsky's project for Burger King ushered in a new era of marketing. It was the first time marketers recognized word of mouth as a marketing tool. And it was cheap. They rushed to make their own viral videos, with a few wins and more losses. The videos were creative, funny and maybe even non-PC.

So why didn't they take off?  Because those marketers were playing in a very different social climate. Today, a couple of clicks share content on Facebook and YouTube. RSS and twitter prolong the relevance of blog posts about your video or site.  The concept and belief in sharing has never been more accepted (and deemed essential) by marketers and now, there's a rush to get involved in the conversation.

As a result, the term "viral" has evolved.  Marketers no longer issue "viral" content.  They issue lightly branded entertainment or leak information through social media channels, hoping the word will spread through influencers.  This isn't a bad strategy...assuming the content is actually good.

Meanwhile, truly viral communications -- videos like the Dancing Man and JK Wedding Dance -- are organic successes.  The content is good enough that people want to share it.

As a marketer and communicator, it's easy to get caught up in the social media formula that everyone else is using. Converse with your customers and leads, ask for product feedback, give them a chance to participate, don't sell too hard.  But here's the problem: Conversation doesn't replace creativity.  If that's all you are bringing to your customers, it's a cop out.  Consumers don't respect an organization just for being nice and conversational, especially if it's just following the same formula as every other brand trying out social.  Consumers are still looking for creativity, because it reflects innovation, progress and leadership.

Before you start the conversation, you have to bring something to the table beyond just words and engagement.  To use an overused phrase, "talk is cheap."  Make sure you message or brand comes with a reason for people to talk back.

Wednesday
10Jun2009

Leroy Smith: a new traditional campaign

I first heard the legend of Leroy Smith last week and since then, he has been hard to avoid. In a very good way.

According to Leroy's personal site, GetYourBasketballOn.com, he is "the man that motivated Michael Jordan". The Leroy Smith character is based on the real Leroy Smith, who beat a young Jordan for the final varsity team spot in high school. Following that disappointment, Jordan worked twice as hard and became...well, Michael Jordan.

Created for Nike by ad agency Wieden+Kennedy, Leroy's character is played by the hilarious Charlie Murphy (of Chapelle Show fame). Leroy's personal site includes motivational DVDs, a video game and a petition to induct Leroy into the Basketball Hall of Fame. Adverblog has a review of the campaign here.

I love this campaign because it's the perfect storm of creativity, compelling content and social media execution.

The idea
This campaign is a departure from the tone Nike usually lends to air Air Jordans. With Leroy Smith, they have created a character in the spirit of basketball that manages to pull in an audience beyond basketball fans with humorous, engaging content. Of course, Leroy's portrayal by Charlie Murphy goes a long way in bringing in those extra fans.

Most importantly, the campaign stays true to the brand. The legend of Michael Jordan is the star.

The right use of digital/social
Giving Leroy his own personal site to distribute motivational DVDs, spectacular songs (such as "My Gift to the Game"), and his petition for the Hall of Fame, is a no brainer. Making these items shareable isn't exactly a reach either. However, I am pretty impressed by the twitter and Facebook presences. Leroy uses twitter to spout motivational wisdom that you can't find anywhere else. A tweet from last night (in reference to Manny Ramirez):

Leroy is interacting with his followers and fans as well, and his presence in social media extends the experience while managing to synch with the digital elements. In this case, twitter and Facebook aren't seen as boxes to check off in the marketing mix. They received just as much attention as every other piece.

Above and beyond
The use of digital hubs with social media staples Facebook, twitter and YouTube have become the new campaign distribution formula. Especially for reaching a coveted demographic that now spends more time consuming media online than anywhere else. But this audience isn't only on Facebook and twitter all day, which is why Nike went the extra mile and made sure Leroy got interviews with ESPN's Scoop Jackson and CNBC's Darren Rovell. The interviews blur the lines, prompting the reader to ask again -- "Who is Leroy Smith?" And, as with the rest of the campaign, the voice of Leroy is spot on, forming another nice piece in the marketing mix.

When it comes to reaching an online audience, the challenge every marketer faces is not only giving their audience a reason to care about the message, but a reason to share it.  Digital media doesn't work alone, and neither does social media.  Making them work together (and the audience work for you) is the new traditional campaign, and it's exactly what Nike does with the Leroy Smith character.

Advertisers used to struggle (and often fail) at the integration of TV, print and online banners.  Well, the new challenge is digital.  Fortunately there's a formula.  Just ask Leroy.

Monday
01Dec2008

If you must advertise on TV...

After a weekend spent watching more TV than I usually do -- bad weather and laziness contributed to this -- I reached a boiling point. The final straw was viewing a free on-demand movie and being subjected to the same three TNT show promos every 20 minutes. Same three, same order every time. They realize that viewers can fast forward through these, right?

This morning, AdAge published this "news": Repeat Ad Nauseum: TV Spots Risk Driving Consumers Away. Obviously, this isn't news, but I thought it was pretty interesting timing. Maybe everyone else is reaching a similar boiling point at the same time? Or maybe a lot of advertisers still don't understand that TV and media consumption has changed significantly, and will continue to change.

When I think about what I recall from the video/tv ads I saw this weekend, there are three that immediately come to mind for me. It only took one viewing of each for me to recall them, and two of the three I saw online, not on television. The first was Wii Music, which I shared on this blog yesterday. The other two are for Adidas Originals and Bruce Lee's playing ping pong for Nokia.

So what does it mean that I recalled ads that I saw once, while I won't remember the other ads until I see them again? Keep in mind, many of these are common sense.

  • The TV spot isn't dead. Just the really bad ones. I know, I know. The ads above were practically made for me (males 25-35 target), but that doesn't make them any less compelling.
  • Targeting still matters. I know we're in a fragmented media market, but at least try to buy media in appropriate spots.
  • If you must run ads during shows or movies that are made available on demand, there is an even bigger opportunity to target specifically and run more captivating ads. Mad Men does a great job of this. These ads often come as a surprise to a viewer who is expecting to settle in for a commercial-free movie, so they are quick to get annoyed. Their finger never leaves the "forward" button on the remote.
  • Shows airing online should not have the exact same commercials as they did when they ran on television. The audience watching has changed, and so should the ads
  • Even good spots get old when people are forced to watch them every fifteen minutes. It's possible to actually lose customers by doing this.
  • All ads should exist online, be embeddable and allow comments.
  • And probably the most important one: Make spots that people want to watch, not that they have to. All ads are more compelling when people come to you.

Thoughts?